IGT logo

National Center for Image Guided Therapy

The Publication Database hosted by SPL

All Publications | Upload | Advanced Search | Gallery View | Download Statistics | Help | Import | Log in

Spiny Versus Stubby: 3D Reconstruction of Human Myenteric (type I) Neurons

Institution:
1Department of Anatomy I, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Krankenhausstrasse 9, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
2Section of Experimental Magnetic Resonance of the CNS, University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
3Surgical Planning Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
4Isomics Inc., Cambridge, MA 02115, USA
Publisher:
Histochem Cell Biol
Publication Date:
Jan-2009
Volume Number:
131
Issue Number:
1
Pages:
1-12
Citation:
Histochem Cell Biol. 2009 Jan;131(1):1-12.
PubMed ID:
18807064
PMCID:
PMC2756529
Keywords:
Neuron type, Confocal microscopy, Gut, Enteric nervous system, Innervation
Appears in Collections:
SLICER, NA-MIC, NAC, SPL
Sponsors:
P41 RR13218 RR/NCRR NIH
U54 EB005149 EB/NIBIB NIH
Generated Citation:
Lindig T.M.., Kumar V., Kikinis R., Pieper S., Schrödl F., Neuhuber W.L.., Brehmer A. Spiny Versus Stubby: 3D Reconstruction of Human Myenteric (type I) Neurons. Histochem Cell Biol. 2009 Jan;131(1):1-12. PMID: 18807064. PMCID: PMC2756529.
Downloaded: 1326 times. [view map]
Paper: Download, View online
Export citation:

We have compared the three-dimensional (3D) morphology of stubby and spiny neurons derived from the human small intestine. After immunohistochemical triple staining for leu-enkephalin (ENK), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and neurofilament (NF), neurons were selected and scanned based on their immunoreactivity, whether ENK (stubby) or VIP (spiny). For the 3D reconstruction, we focused on confocal data pre-processing with intensity drop correction, non-blind deconvolution, an additional compression procedure in z-direction, and optimizing segmentation reliability. 3D Slicer software enabled a semi-automated segmentation based on an objective threshold (interrater and intrarater reliability, both 0.99). We found that most dendrites of stubby neurons emerged only from the somal circumference, whereas in spiny neurons, they also emerged from the luminal somal surface. In most neurons, the nucleus was positioned abluminally in its soma. The volumes of spiny neurons were significantly larger than those of stubby neurons (total mean of stubbies 806±128 μm3, of spinies 2,316±545 μm3), and spiny neurons had more dendrites (26.3 vs. 11.3). The ratios of somal versus dendritic volumes were 1:1.2 in spiny and 1:0.3 in stubby neurons. In conclusion, 3D reconstruction revealed new differences between stubby and spiny neurons and allowed estimations of volumetric data of these neuron populations.

Additional Material
1 File (172.113kB)
Lindig-HistochemCellBiol2009-fig6.jpg (172.113kB)